Ignoring the Mommy Wars. Part 1
26 06 2009Rebecca Mark-Jusbasche is superwoman. A multimillionaire former executive, she was named one of Fortune magazine’s 50 Most Powerful Women in Business. She also raised twin boys while building her career, taking them as toddlers to Harvard Business School with her, then bringing them along on the corporate jet when she could. Granted, not everything went perfectly. She didn’t make every swim meet, and her career, as a wheeler-dealer at the now-bankrupt Enron, is probably over.
Predictably the controversy, like so much of the ongoing Mommy wars, split along ideological lines. The Right mustered a certain “I told you so,” attitude and called for a return to the traditional family—dads who work and moms who don’t. Richard Lowry of National Review, for instance, has been on a crusade in recent years, writing, “Working moms are at the very center of a variety of cultural ills. Maybe a little stigma is what they deserve.” Those on the Left have been equally apoplectic. “There is an antifeminist agenda that says we should go back to the 1950′s,” Caryl Rivers, a professor at Boston University, told Time magazine. “The subliminal message is ‘Don’t get too educated; don’t get too successful or too ambitious.’”
But missing in all the hubbub are the tales of women such as Mark-Jusbasche. Over half of the high-achieving women Hewlett studied did indeed have it all—kids and a successful career. So despite dire warnings (including a headline in USA Today intoning: “Young women must choose”), the mommy-track and career-track don’t have to be at odds. The 51% of these $100,000 women who also have kids can serve as an inspiration for younger women who want to travel both roads.
to be continue…